The uncontrolled proliferation of AI agents across an organization, built by multiple teams without centralized visibility, governance, or a shared understanding of what already exists.
SaaS sprawl taught organizations that buying 300 apps without a central inventory creates waste. Agent sprawl is teaching the same lesson with higher stakes, because AI agents do not sit passively in a software catalog. They make decisions and take actions.
Agent sprawl happens when different teams across an organization build and deploy AI agents independently. Marketing has its agents. Sales has its agents. Operations, finance, HR, and customer service each have their own. No central team knows how many agents exist, what data they access, what permissions they hold, or how they interact with each other.
Why it accelerates
Two forces. First, agent-building tools are now accessible to non-developers. Platform features like Microsoft Copilot Studio and Salesforce Agentforce let business users create agents without IT involvement. Second, there is no natural friction. Spinning up a new agent is faster and easier than finding and reusing one that already exists. The same dynamic that drove SaaS sprawl is playing out with agents, faster.
What makes it dangerous
Redundancy is the obvious cost. Five teams building five agents that do similar things with different data sources. The deeper problem is conflicting logic. Two agents making decisions about the same customer using different rules and different data can produce contradictory outcomes that no one detects until the customer experiences them.
The governance response
Start with an agent registry. Track every agent, its owner, its purpose, its permissions, its model, its data access, and its status. Then apply the principle of least privilege, because most agents are granted far more access than their task requires. The organizations that figure out agent governance in 2026 will have an operational advantage over those that wait.